<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/</link>
	<description>....I'm not kidding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: F.Fox</title>
		<link>http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>F.Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>&quot;The fact still remains IE based browsers are completely compatible with the most websites and that is not going to change any time soon.&quot;

Microsoft&#039;s Chris Wilson would seem to disagree:

&quot;One of the things that we&#039;ve been doing for some time now has been approaching a lot of the web development community and in particular site authors directly even, and saying: we found that there&#039;s a problem with your web site when you use IE7, and it&#039;s because of a standards improvement that we&#039;ve done - here are the details of it. Also here&#039;s a set of tools that you can go and analyze your site with and figure out what sort of CSS hacks, and that sort of thing, you&#039;re using to work around IE6 problems from before. And then you&#039;ll know how to fix them to work with IE7 and its better standards compliance.&quot;

http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=260

In other words, IE7 is going to be in trouble if websites don&#039;t take out all the hacks that cause Opera and Firefox so many problems. As IE7 is due any time now, Andrew K&#039;s statement is nonsense: IE based browsers are going to start having problems soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The fact still remains IE based browsers are completely compatible with the most websites and that is not going to change any time soon.&#8221;</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s Chris Wilson would seem to disagree:</p>
<p>&#8220;One of the things that we&#8217;ve been doing for some time now has been approaching a lot of the web development community and in particular site authors directly even, and saying: we found that there&#8217;s a problem with your web site when you use IE7, and it&#8217;s because of a standards improvement that we&#8217;ve done &#8211; here are the details of it. Also here&#8217;s a set of tools that you can go and analyze your site with and figure out what sort of CSS hacks, and that sort of thing, you&#8217;re using to work around IE6 problems from before. And then you&#8217;ll know how to fix them to work with IE7 and its better standards compliance.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=260" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=260</a></p>
<p>In other words, IE7 is going to be in trouble if websites don&#8217;t take out all the hacks that cause Opera and Firefox so many problems. As IE7 is due any time now, Andrew K&#8217;s statement is nonsense: IE based browsers are going to start having problems soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew K</title>
		<link>http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 22:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I am in favor of letting people know the truth. The fact still remains IE based browsers are completely compatible with the most websites and that is not going to change any time soon. And yes I also use IE 24/7 and I do not have ANY problems. I also support thousands of clients from home users to businesses. If you want to surf with the same reassurance use this guide:

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/SecureXP.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in favor of letting people know the truth. The fact still remains IE based browsers are completely compatible with the most websites and that is not going to change any time soon. And yes I also use IE 24/7 and I do not have ANY problems. I also support thousands of clients from home users to businesses. If you want to surf with the same reassurance use this guide:</p>
<p><a href="http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/SecureXP.html" rel="nofollow">http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/SecureXP.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaushik</title>
		<link>http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaushik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 14:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>That Andrew K guy is actually in favour of IE.
May God protect his PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Andrew K guy is actually in favour of IE.<br />
May God protect his PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shavam</title>
		<link>http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>shavam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 12:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>OPERA RULES
muhahahahahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OPERA RULES<br />
muhahahahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 09:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;m writing is purely on the basis of what I&#039;ve read across the web at various sites. If the facts are otherwise, then I&#039;m ready to accept them.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;m writing is purely on the basis of what I&#8217;ve read across the web at various sites. If the facts are otherwise, then I&#8217;m ready to accept them.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew K</title>
		<link>http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 05:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>1. The speculation of hidden APIs are irrelevant, if the minimum requirements are lower they are lower.

2. IE doesn&#039;t communicate in any non standard way and that doesn&#039;t really make sense. Because if you were putting more load on a server, the browser would then be slower. I have yet to see any documented evidence of a tweaked version of Firefox being faster and I am not talking about using Adblock and Fasterfox.

3. Firefox still has lots of vulnerabilities, see number 4.

4. Those two are proof Firefox Vulnerabilities clearly are not fixed within hours. How many IE vulnerabilities exist or their time to be patched is irrelevant to this fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The speculation of hidden APIs are irrelevant, if the minimum requirements are lower they are lower.</p>
<p>2. IE doesn&#8217;t communicate in any non standard way and that doesn&#8217;t really make sense. Because if you were putting more load on a server, the browser would then be slower. I have yet to see any documented evidence of a tweaked version of Firefox being faster and I am not talking about using Adblock and Fasterfox.</p>
<p>3. Firefox still has lots of vulnerabilities, see number 4.</p>
<p>4. Those two are proof Firefox Vulnerabilities clearly are not fixed within hours. How many IE vulnerabilities exist or their time to be patched is irrelevant to this fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subbu</title>
		<link>http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Subbu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 13:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxdamage.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/firefox-myths/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Acid 2 CSS Test to be Precise..

Firefox 3.0 will Pass it.. Opera Does now..

IE7 is not Even Close to Firefox 1.5..

Well.. One thing i have to Agree is that IE7 is Getting Faster..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acid 2 CSS Test to be Precise..</p>
<p>Firefox 3.0 will Pass it.. Opera Does now..</p>
<p>IE7 is not Even Close to Firefox 1.5..</p>
<p>Well.. One thing i have to Agree is that IE7 is Getting Faster..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
